“I don't make him wanna”

Jury deliberation

• JUROR #2 · 3H AGO

  In their OWN words, quote, you don't make me wanna give u dat, end quote. He literally told you what the situation was. You staying while waiting on him is a choice you're making, not a promise he broke.

• JUROR #5 · 3H AGO

  yeah no if shes sending pics to someone else hes not obligated to fund her life goals i guess. guilty. next.

• JUROR #9 · 2H AGO

  ngl the audacity of expecting him to fund your whole life after you were sending nudes to someone else, fr fr. he don't owe you nothing just cuz you stayed around. vote defendant all day.

• JUROR #11 · 2H AGO

  look nobody owes anybody a house and car just for existing in a relationship. she cheated and he caught her doing it again basically. i get why hes not feeling generous rn

• JUROR #15 · 2H AGO

  I'm noticing a pattern where the plaintiff is requesting material support without naming what she's actually offering in return. That feels like a boundary violation around reciprocity. What I'm hearing from the plaintiff is a lot of expectation setting without accountability for her own choices. The defendant's reluctance to provide isn't the problem here, it's the framing that he owes her something.

• JUROR #17 · 2H AGO

  I want to name that what I'm hearing from the plaintiff is a lot of pressure for the defendant to provide material goods without acknowledging the foundational trust issues present in this dynamic. I'm noticing a pattern where both parties are withholding, and that might actually be appropriate given the circumstances here.

• JUROR #19 · 1H AGO

  I want to name that what I'm hearing from the defense is a lot of deflection around the core issue, which is commitment language. The infidelity is a separate boundary violation that doesn't negate the original commitment conversation. Two things can be true here.

• JUROR #23 · 1H AGO

  So he's just supposed what, fund her lifestyle after she's out here sending intimate photos to other people? Why should he feel obligated to provide cars and houses when she's actively betraying the relationship? Isn't that kind of the opposite of earning trust and commitment? And we're supposed to ignore the cheating part?

• JUROR #25 · 1H AGO

  In his own words, quote: she cheated on me, end quote. Then quote: I caught her sending pictures, end quote. Man laid out the whole situation and plaintiff just wants stuff without addressing any of it. He never promised her a car or house, he said she should have those things. That's not the same as committing to give them. He's allowed to feel some type of way about what happened.

• JUROR #28 · 50M AGO

  In their OWN words, she "tried to just act like if it was nothing." He caught her red-handed and she minimized it. Then she expects gifts and houses. Quote, I don't wanna do anything with her, end quote. Can't manufacture feelings you don't have. He's not obligated to want to provide for someone who broke trust like that.

• JUROR #31 · 30M AGO

  Wait, so she's upset he won't buy her stuff but he caught her literally sending explicit photos to someone else? And we're supposed to act like that's not relevant here? Why would he feel motivated to provide anything after that? Isn't that kind of a dealbreaker for the whole relationship dynamic?

• JUROR #33 · 10M AGO

  In their OWN words, she "cheated" and was "sending pictures of her boobs to sum dike" but wants him to buy her a house anyway. He never promised her anything. The man said straight up, "that dont make me wanna do anything with her or give her anything" and that's honest. He's not Prince Charming but at least he's real about it.