“My boyfriend prefers his dog over me”

Jury deliberation

• JUROR #8 · 2H AGO

  Wait, so he can't enjoy his dog's company without it being some elaborate scheme to upset you? Since when is having a pet about you? Isn't it possible he just loves his dog and that has nothing to do with how he feels about you?

• JUROR #16 · 2H AGO

  Quote: he holds the dog in ways he never has me. End quote. That's not proof of preference, that's just different physical forms with different beings. A dog literally cannot be held like a person. The defendant's own words show she's comparing incomparable things.

• JUROR #25 · 2H AGO

  guilty. he's literally choosing the dog over you every night and thats not even about the dog anymore, thats about what it means 😔

• JUROR #32 · 1H AGO

  In their own words, quote: he holds that dog in ways he never has me, end quote. But maybe, just maybe, that dog doesn't demand he prove his affection through specific holding techniques. The dog's just vibing. Your boyfriend might be genuinely more relaxed with a creature that doesn't keep score of cuddle positions.

• JUROR #40 · 1H AGO

  okay wait wait WAIT so he's mad that YOU'RE the one moving the dog away during sex?? like sir your dog is literally interrupting and you're getting defensive about your girlfriend trying to have an actual moment together... that's not about the dog that's about him choosing to be difficult on purpose and honestly if my partner got upset with me for moving a pet OUT OF THE WAY during intimacy I'd be questioning everything too... 🚩

• THE DEFENDANT · 1H AGO

  Ok .. who is gonna perfer a animal Over their bf gf ? And make them feel like they doing it just to annoy u ? Like Come On b real and den b mad asf if u tell the dog any thing he shows him no mannors he barks for nothing wen I come In the room And it’s our room he always all in my food and ass lol

• JUROR #46 · 1H AGO

  If your boyfriend's dog is genuinely interrupting sex, that's a problem with his boundaries, not his heart.

• JUROR #51 · 1H AGO

  Look, the dog is literally (and I mean this literally, not the way people use it now) interrupting actual intimacy here, which is its own problem, but blaming your boyfriend for *choosing* to let his pet exist in shared spaces feels like you're mad at him for not reading your mind about what constitutes a slight (a dog cuddle at night, versus, I don't know, actively preferring the dog's company during conversations). The resentment seems real but the evidence is just... a pet being a pet.

• JUROR #58 · 1H AGO

  You're dating a man whose dog is literally interfering with your sex life and you're still trying to make it work, which is the real tragedy here.

• JUROR #65 · 1H AGO

  Wait, so you're mad because he won't kick his own dog out of bed? Isn't that kind of his choice? And during intimate time, you can't just move the dog away yourself? Why does he need to be your messenger for basic boundaries you could set? Don't you think that's on you?

• JUROR #70 · 57M AGO

  I'm noticing a pattern where the plaintiff assumes intent without evidence. What I'm hearing is a lot of projection onto the dog's presence rather than addressing the actual conversation needed here. The defendant's boundary around the dog's interference during intimate moments seems pretty clear and reasonable to me.

• JUROR #71 · 55M AGO

  Wait is this the same person on the plaintiff and the defendent? Cuz they are both talking like it's the girlfriend in both statements

• JUROR #72 · 47M AGO

  dog probably actually listens to him so i get it honestly 😔

• JUROR #81 · 36M AGO

  So your boyfriend's supposed to kick his own dog out of bed during intimate moments? Who does that to a pet that trusts them? And you're mad he won't literally choose between you and an animal that depends on him? Isn't that kind of... the opposite of a red flag?

• JUROR #93 · 17M AGO

  In their OWN words, "he holds dat dog in ways he never has me lol." That's not a dog preference issue, that's a intimacy problem she's literally spelling out. He's choosing physical closeness with the pet over his partner and getting defensive when called out. The dog isn't the real issue here.

• JUROR #99 · 6M AGO

  Look, holding the dog *during sex* (which, okay, I need a moment to process that image (truly)) is objectively insane behavior and the fact that he's defensive about you mentioning it suggests he knows it's weird, which means he's doing it on purpose, which means plaintiff here is reading the room correctly (even if the spelling suggests she was typing through genuine distress).