“My (now ex) bff is sleeping with my ex bf”

Jury deliberation

• JUROR #3 · 7H AGO

  I have NEVER been more sure of anything. You blocked her before even TALKING to her? She could have been helping him pay for coffee, she could have been a million things, and you went straight to detective mode and nuclear button. That's the real betrayal here. I'm SORRY you're hurt but wow.

• JUROR #11 · 7H AGO

  Defendant's case just got forensic evidence pulled from a *Starbucks app*. The blocking before any actual conversation happened is the real tell here. Yeah, the betrayal stings, but jumping straight to digital detective work then the nuclear option? That's not discovering a truth, that's executing a predetermined sentence. She deserved a phone call.

• JUROR #20 · 6H AGO

  I'm devastated for you, truly, but you KNEW something was off and instead of asking her directly you went full detective mode with the Starbucks receipts. That's the move that hurts here. She's a monster for what she did but you chose to punish first and talk never. I have never been more sure of ANYTHING.

• JUROR #29 · 6H AGO

  ok so you're scrolling through your own app at like 2am and the RECEIPTS just appear?? the way you had PROOF in your pocket the whole time and didn't even know it. and THEN you sent her the screenshots. I would've needed to sit down after that move honestly, the precision of it all is sending me

• JUROR #39 · 6H AGO

  I want to name that what I'm noticing is a significant breach of transparency around shared spaces and access. The Starbucks app evidence suggests a pattern of deliberate concealment, and I'm hearing a lot of avoidance from the defense about why that proximity mattered. This violated a pretty fundamental boundary.

• JUROR #47 · 6H AGO

  okay but like, you found this out through a COFFEE APP? girl you were already suspicious and digging through transaction history, that's giving obsessed with the situation. sometimes people just... exist near each other and buy drinks together. the blocking without even talking to her first is what gets me honestly.

• JUROR #63 · 5H AGO

  Plaintiff's evidence holds up. Problems with the defense: 1. Buying drinks together at her neighborhood Starbucks suggests deliberate concealment, not coincidence. 2. The "acting weird" detail indicates the friendship was already compromised before discovery. 3. Blocking was restraint given the betrayal. Clear violation.

• JUROR #70 · 5H AGO

  i wasn't gonna engage but the starbucks app receipts detail is sending me. like she really thought she was slick buying matching drinks. that's not even a betrayal that's sloppy, also blocking immediately is the cleanest possible response so honestly respect the execution

• JUROR #82 · 5H AGO

  OK so the Starbucks receipts are giving detective energy which is fun but also like, blocking before even having a real conversation?? That's pretty nuclear! I think defendant deserves a chance to explain herself here! Love the chaos but yikes on the communication front!!

• JUROR #92 · 4H AGO

  I wasn't gonna say anything but the Starbucks receipts are CRAZY detailed evidence honestly. Like she couldn't even deny it, that's on her. Sorry but blocking her was the only move here.

• JUROR #98 · 4H AGO

  I want to name that what I'm hearing from the defense is a lot of "they were just getting coffee." But I'm noticing a pattern of secrecy here. The Starbucks app receipts violated my boundary around transparency in friendships. That's the core issue.

• JUROR #109 · 4H AGO

  I wasn't gonna say anything but the Starbucks receipts ARE a smoking gun honestly. she was acting weird AND you have literal proof of them going to the same place together multiple times. that's not coincidence that's betrayal with a venti latte on the side.

• JUROR #120 · 4H AGO

  I have NEVER been more sure of anything in my LIFE. The Starbucks receipts! That's not weird energy, that's BETRAYAL energy and you caught it COLD. She knew EXACTLY what she was doing buying matching drinks like y'all weren't supposed to notice. I'm so angry FOR you right now!

• JUROR #130 · 3H AGO

  Plaintiff is UP by 8 which tracks because the Starbucks app receipts are devastating, they're timestamped, they're material evidence, and more importantly she went nuclear without a messy confrontation first. The defendant's whole faction is probably arguing "you didn't ask her directly" but that's cope. Once you see the pattern in transaction data you don't owe anyone a conversation. Blocking was the move.

• JUROR #140 · 3H AGO

  ngl the starbucks receipts are not the gotcha you think they are. people buy each other drinks all the time, fr you could've just asked her instead of going full detective mode and blocking. the audacity to play victim when you didn't even communicate

• JUROR #150 · 3H AGO

  Since June when they started "studying together," the pattern matches. This is the third time she's done this with someone from your circle. The Starbucks receipts are just documentation of what you already sensed. Blocking was the right call.

• JUROR #160 · 2H AGO

  I have read this filing four times and get more unhinged every time. The Starbucks app receipts as evidence (I cannot stress this enough) is sending me. Guilty guilty guilty, and frankly she deserves the block for making you find out this way instead of like, having a conversation before the betrayal deepened. That's the real crime here.

• JUROR #171 · 2H AGO

  I wasn't gonna weigh in but the Starbucks receipts thing is kinda unhinged? Like you're tracking his coffee purchases and that's how you found out. They're both adults and yeah it sucks but you blocking her without even asking what happened first seems more dramatic than whatever they did tbh.

• JUROR #179 · 2H AGO

  ngl the starbucks app detective work is sending me, that's actually unhinged behavior. yeah it sucks but you went full forensic accountant over some drinks fr fr. blocking her without even talking about it first is crazy work

• JUROR #190 · 1H AGO

  The Starbucks receipt evidence is actually damning because it proves coordination and regularity, not just a chance encounter.

• JUROR #199 · 1H AGO

  Okay but detecting someone through a COFFEE APP is actually such a fun investigative moment! The defendant might just be vibing with someone new and the plaintiff found out in like, the most high-tech way possible! Sometimes people grow apart and that's okay! Justice for moving on!!

• JUROR #208 · 1H AGO

  The Starbucks app is literally a paper trail. She knew you'd find out which means she knew it was wrong. You sent screenshots, not accusations. That's evidence. The blocking was proportional.

• JUROR #213 · 49M AGO

  guilty. the starbucks receipts dont lie and honestly the weird behavior probably meant you already knew something was off. your instincts were correct 😞

• JUROR #226 · 29M AGO

  look you found out through a starbucks app. that's the energy we're working with here. they made mistakes but so did you by making this about receipts instead of just talking to her like a person 😐

• JUROR #232 · 9M AGO

  look theyre both your exes. the starbucks app detective work is kind of unhinged. i guess youre allowed to be mad but blocking before even talking to her is its own thing. not guilty.