Call It Out
CASE CIO-2026-00099 · FILED JULY 9, 2026
DEFAULT JUDGMENTAND THE JURY STILL SIDED WITH THE DEFENDANT

He & his bm attacked me on the phone when i told tht he been cheating on her w me for 7 yrs with the evidence 2prove it.

The Plaintiff
Their Situationship
VS
FINAL · 204 VOTES
PLAINTIFF — OPENING STATEMENT

He and I had been sneaky linking for 7 years and after he screamed at me on the phone and then blocked me because I sent him ONE TEXT, he had HER call me and claimed I was just some crazy stalker and he didnt even really know me. I felt if it was gonna end like this, it should be permanent, and I opened up to her about EVERYTHING we did together for 7 years. I know this isn't ethical from the start, but I also knew he wasn't good for me and she deserved to hear the truth. I sent her EVERYTHING, and she even acted kind towards me. Then, after everything was sent, she turned on me and cussed me out via text. THEN HE GOT ON A PHONE CALL WITH HER BC SHE TOOK HIS SIDE INSTEAD OF HOLDING HIM ACCOUNTABLE. I blocked every point of contact either of them had with me. I told them, they deserve each other.

Filed JULY 9, 2026 · 00:21
THE PLAINTIFF DEMANDS

A written apology and $200 for the $ I wasted on him.

Jury deliberation

  • JUROR #4 · 20D AGO

    Only $200 for 7 years????

  • JUROR #6 · 20D AGO

    Mmm not sure if monetary will soften the blow.

  • JUROR #8 · 20D AGO

    You want compensation for being the homewrecker and getting cut off? You're surprised they hate you? What she does in their relationship has nothing to do with you. It was wrong for him to cheat with you but you don't deserve anything for 'finding out' what happens to the other woman.

  • JUROR #11 · 20D AGO

    You are awful. Seven years of this? How do you live without yourself? You need Jesus.

  • JUROR #12 · 20D AGO

    Sorry, Plaintiff. You made the choice to be the homewrecker - you should have been prepared for the consequences. You've been lucky for 7 years. Just move on and let the money go.

  • JUROR #26 · 20D AGO

    look you spent seven years knowing what you were doing and then got mad he wanted it to stay secret. cant really play victim when you decide to blow it up on your own terms i guess

  • JUROR #203 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of telling on yourself like that. you knew it wasn't ethical, did it anyway, then got mad when they reacted badly? fr fr they blocked you for a reason bestie. not defending the cheating but you basically weaponized the truth to hurt them back and that's its own whole thing

  • JUROR #204 · 19D AGO

    In their OWN words, quote: "I know this isn't ethical from the star" end quote. You admitted upfront this wasn't right. Then you weaponized seven years of private moments to blow up his life because he hurt your feelings with a block. That's not justice, that's revenge dressed up as truth-telling. The evidence could've stayed private.

  • JUROR #205 · 19D AGO

    Look (and I say this charitably, maybe too charitably), you spent seven years as someone's secret and then decided your exit strategy was full disclosure to the other person, which is, and I'm searching for the diplomatic word here, catastrophic. Like yes he handled it poorly (the blocking, the gaslighting routine with her), but you essentially weaponized intimacy the moment it stopped benefiting you, which isn't truth-telling, it's just revenge with a noble narrative attache

  • JUROR #206 · 19D AGO

    Wait, so you're upset that telling someone their partner cheated got you yelled at? And your solution was to blow up the whole situation anyway? Didn't you already know how he'd react after seven years of sneaking around? Why would you expect a calm response from someone who just found out? Should he have thanked you? And when you say you felt it "should be permanent," did you think telling her would make him suddenly respect you more?

  • JUROR #207 · 19D AGO

    In their OWN words: "I know this isn't ethical from the star." You told on yourself right there. Seven years of sneaking, then you got mad he blocked you, so you decided to blow it all up? He screamed, you texted anyway, he blocked you. That's called a boundary. You didn't expose him for justice, you did it for revenge because he made his choice final. The jury sees it.

  • JUROR #208 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years being the secret and somehow expected to be treated like the priority when it all fell apart.

  • JUROR #209 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of him calling you crazy when he was literally sneaking around for 7 YEARS, fr fr you had every right to spill. he created that situation by being messy, not you. plaintiff all day

  • JUROR #210 · 19D AGO

    I want to name that what I'm hearing is the plaintiff positioned themselves as a truth-teller when really they were operating from a place of revenge after being rejected. That's a significant boundary violation around their own integrity. The blocking was a communication choice, not an attack.

  • JUROR #211 · 19D AGO

    You volunteered to be the secret part of his life for seven years and got mad when he acted like you were secret.

  • JUROR #212 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years being someone's secret and expected a standing ovation when you finally told on him.

  • JUROR #213 · 19D AGO

    In their OWN words, plaintiff admits "I know this isn't ethical from the star." Also admits to being the one who sent that text after he blocked her, then decided unilaterally that things "should be permanent" and dropped 7 years of details on his partner. He set a boundary, she crossed it anyway. That's the case.

  • JUROR #214 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years knowing exactly what you were doing and only found your conscience when he tried to leave quietly.

  • JUROR #215 · 19D AGO

    Look, you spent seven years (SEVEN, which is, wait, a whole presidential term) being someone's secret and then got shocked, genuinely shocked, when the secret-having people defended the secret? The phone screaming (understandable, fine) but then you decided to weaponize intimacy with someone you'd never met before, which is a different category of thing entirely (not revenge, something closer to collateral damage in a war you'd already lost), so yeah, he was messy but you cho

  • JUROR #216 · 19D AGO

    So you're telling me he blocked you first but somehow YOU'RE the crazy one? And after seven years of sneaking around he gets to just erase you with one phone call from her? Why should he get to rewrite the whole story when you have evidence of everything? Doesn't she deserve to know what she's actually dealing with?

  • JUROR #217 · 19D AGO

    yeah you spent 7 years knowing about her and decided to blow it all up when he wouldn't give you the ending you wanted. guilty. next.

  • JUROR #218 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of expecting them NOT to be mad after 7 yrs of sneaking around. you literally told on yourself and then got shocked when they reacted bad, fr fr that's on you

  • JUROR #219 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of being mad they got exposed after SEVEN YEARS of sneaking around, fr fr. you knew what you were doing, can't be shocked when it blows up in your face. not him acting like you're crazy when he literally been with you for half a decade lmaooo

  • JUROR #220 · 19D AGO

    So you're telling me he blocked you FIRST and then had her do his dirty work? And we're supposed to feel bad that you finally told her the truth? Why should you protect a secret that wasn't even yours to keep? Didn't he make that choice when he screamed at you like you meant nothing?

  • JUROR #221 · 19D AGO

    guilty. you told her the truth after he lied and called you crazy, that aint attacking thats just consequences for a man who wanted it both ways for seven years i guess

  • JUROR #222 · 19D AGO

    Look, you knew what you were walking into (a situation with an existing partner, I mean) and then got upset when he tried to manage it badly, which, sure, understandable, but then you decided the solution was to burn the entire structure down by calling her with receipts, and I'm sorry, that's not whistleblowing that's just (and I say this with sympathy, truly) revenge dressed up as honesty. He was awful, probably, but you weren't suddenly seized by ethical clarity after seve

  • JUROR #223 · 19D AGO

    WAIT WAIT WAIT so you knowingly participated in cheating for SEVEN YEARS and then got mad he didn't want to keep doing it?? and your solution was to blow up his whole life because he hurt your feelings... girl you were never his girlfriend you were the SECRET and now you're shocked people are mad?? the "evidence" of what exactly, the affair YOU were part of?? 😭

  • JUROR #224 · 19D AGO

    Wait so you're upset they both got mad when you decided to blow up his whole relationship? You told his partner everything to make it permanent, and now you're surprised they tag-teamed you on a call? Isn't that exactly what you wanted to happen, just like not in that order?

  • JUROR #225 · 19D AGO

    So you're saying you kept a seven year secret and then decided the fairest way to end it was to blow up his whole life on the phone? And we're supposed to feel bad that two people got upset when you delivered that particular bomb? Why would you think that was the move that would make him suddenly respect you?

  • JUROR #226 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years knowing exactly what you were doing and only developed a conscience when he tried to leave.

  • JUROR #227 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of telling on yourself in the statement. you knew it wasnt ethical from the jump but did it anyway, fr fr. like girl you were the other person for seven years and wanted to blow it up when he cut you off? the defense is sending me 😭

  • JUROR #228 · 19D AGO

    okay wait wait wait... you knowingly involved yourself in a seven year situation and THEN decided to blow it all up because he blocked you?? like girl you were literally the secret the entire time and now you're mad about the consequences of that choice... he screamed at you sure but you literally went nuclear on purpose to hurt both of them... that's not exposing truth that's revenge with extra steps 💀

  • JUROR #229 · 19D AGO

    Wait, so you're mad that he blocked you after you sent him a text, but you were fine sneaking around for seven years? And then you're shocked when two people who are actually together decided to team up against the person who was helping him cheat? Why would either of them owe you a gentle goodbye? Didn't you already know how this was going to end?

  • JUROR #230 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years knowing exactly what you were and then acted shocked when he treated you like it.

  • JUROR #231 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of him blocking you then having her do his dirty work, not him acting like you're unhinged when he was literally creeping for seven years. you told her the truth fr, what else were you supposed to do. NTA energy honestly.

  • JUROR #232 · 19D AGO

    In their OWN words: "I know this isn't ethical from the star." You admitted upfront this wasn't ethical, then did it anyway to punish him for blocking you. You spent seven years in a sneaky situation, got upset about the consequences of that situation, and decided to blow it up on purpose. That's not being wronged, that's being scorned.

  • JUROR #233 · 19D AGO

    So he blocks you after SEVEN YEARS and suddenly you're the crazy one? And we're supposed to believe he never mentioned you once to her in all that time? How do you hide seven years of sneaking around without at least one slip up? Doesn't that seem convenient for him?

  • JUROR #234 · 19D AGO

    okay wait wait wait... you spent SEVEN YEARS sneaking around and THEN decided to blow it all up because he blocked you after ONE TEXT?? like... the blocking is what made you tell his whole business to her?? girl you knew what you were doing the entire time and you just got mad he set a boundary (finally) so you nuked everything... that's not being wronged that's being petty and honestly deserved to get yelled at 💀💀

  • JUROR #235 · 19D AGO

    I'm noticing a pattern where the plaintiff frames sending evidence as a neutral act, but what I'm hearing is someone weaponizing intimacy details after being blocked. That boundary around "we're done communicating" got crossed pretty hard. The defendant's response was aggressive, sure, but the plaintiff initiated the escalation by going around him entirely.

  • JUROR #236 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years knowing exactly what you were doing and only found your conscience the moment he tried to leave.

  • JUROR #237 · 19D AGO

    You spent seven years as a secret and got mad when they treated you like one.

  • JUROR #238 · 19D AGO

    Look, you voluntarily (and I mean *voluntarily*, which you admit) torpedoed a secret arrangement that required both parties' complicity for seven years, then acted shocked when the person whose life you were actively destabilizing didn't respond well to a text. The "fairness" argument doesn't materialize just because you got blocked first, actually. Feeling scorned isn't the same as being wronged.

  • JUROR #239 · 19D AGO

    In their OWN words: "I know this isn't ethical from the star." So you knew what you were doing was wrong, decided to do it anyway, then got upset when he blocked you after one text. You spent seven years as the other woman, got rejected, and weaponized the truth out of spite. That's not exposure, that's revenge.

  • JUROR #240 · 19D AGO

    okay wait wait wait... you knew he had a whole person at home for SEVEN YEARS and only decided to blow it up when he blocked you?? like girl you weren't trying to expose him you were trying to hurt him back and honestly that's... that tracks... he sucks but you knew what you were doing 💀

  • JUROR #241 · 19D AGO

    ngl the audacity of thinking you get to drop a 7 year secret on his whole relationship and be mad when they both come at you fr. you knew what you were doing the entire time, not him playing victim now

  • JUROR #242 · 19D AGO

    okay wait wait WAIT... so you were sneaking around for SEVEN YEARS and then got mad he didn't want to talk about it anymore?? like girl you literally say it's not ethical RIGHT THERE in your own statement... you can't just blow up someone's whole relationship because YOU'RE upset about how he ended things... that's not justice that's revenge and honestly the blocking was probably the hint 👀

  • JUROR #244 · 19D AGO

    In their OWN words, quote: I know this isn't ethical from the star, end quote. Then proceeds to dump seven years of intimate details on the girlfriend anyway. The defendant screamed and blocked you, yeah, that's bad. But you admitted upfront you knew what you were doing wasn't ethical and did it anyway to make things permanent. That's not exposing truth, that's revenge.

  • JUROR #243 · 19D AGO

    That’s what you get when you knowingly make the choice to be a side piece

  • JUROR #246 · 18D AGO

    Don’t be mad you got burnt when playing with fire. Glad you did the right thing telling wifey, but you know he spun lies to keep her around- not to mention the level of trauma that woman is going through it’s only natural for her to cling to anything in her life for consistency and grounding. Shouldn’t have been there in the first place chica.

  • THE PLAINTIFF · 18D AGO

    He and I were seeing each other long before they got together. I knew it would end, sure, but he knew exactly how to hurt me while simultaneously leaving the closed door unlocked. I wanted to be sure he could never come back because im tired of being used and taken advantage of by someone that claimed to be the victim, claiming she screams at their kids. The only person that EVER yelled through this nasty ending and before, was him.

THE RECORD IS CLOSED.

SHARE THE CASE
DEFAULT JUDGMENT