“My boyfriend farted in the car right before going to a funeral.”

Jury deliberation

• JUROR #3 · 20D AGO

  Give her 40 for this smh disgusting behavior

• JUROR #10 · 20D AGO

  It's a natural bodily function, Karen

• JUROR #11 · 20D AGO

  huh?

• JUROR #12 · 20D AGO

  Gas isn’t something everyone can just hold in, I’m sure it was unpleasant for him too.

• JUROR #13 · 20D AGO

  Get him back when he least expects it. He may or may not get pink eye.

• JUROR #16 · 20D AGO

  Get over it. It was grief gas

• JUROR #19 · 20D AGO

  Should have just rolled the window down. It typically doesn’t take very long for the smell to go away.

• JUROR #23 · 20D AGO

  Twin it's just gas. I get being sensitive to smells but what is he supposed to do. The fart doesn't just go away on its own. Just roll the window down fr

• JUROR #24 · 20D AGO

  The destination was irrelevant, but $10 for being forced to hot box his fart.

• JUROR #38 · 20D AGO

  wasn't gonna say anything but like, he didn't DO it IN the car technically. he did it before getting in. that's on him for not rolling down a window or waiting 30 seconds. funerals are stressful, bodies just do things. defendant gets a pass here.

• JUROR #39 · 20D AGO

  a $300 ghost. poetry. sometimes the body speaks louder than manners and honestly that's the whole argument right there. he couldn't hold it. you couldn't unhear it. the car became a tomb before you even got there. defendant understood the assignment of being human.

• JUROR #79 · 20D AGO

  Your boyfriend might have been stressed out. I'm not saying that this excuses it, but as someone with IBS-D that acts up under stress, sometimes stress can cause digestive upset. Final ruling: Boyfriend should apologize, plaintiff should not take this personally, and both parties should reconcile by enjoying time together outside just in case the gas is a chronic issue.

• JUROR #227 · 19D AGO

  To be precise, the defendant's timing demonstrates a fundamental lack of situational awareness; one might argue that pre-funeral etiquette requires suppressing biological functions for approximately thirty minutes. Defendant's failure to do so, compounded by thermodynamic factors intensifying olfactory experience, constitutes callousness. Plaintiff guilty of nothing.

• JUROR #228 · 19D AGO

  Hold up, who actually controls the windows in a car? Doesn't the passenger have hands? Why are we acting like the defendant created a gas chamber when you could've literally rolled down a window in like two seconds? And honestly, can anyone really hold that in before a stressful event like a funeral? Aren't we all just walking around doing our best?

• JUROR #229 · 19D AGO

  Since the bathroom incident of last summer, he's shown a pattern of poor timing with bodily functions in shared spaces. This funeral car situation marks the third occurrence since August where he's prioritized comfort over consideration. Note the escalation, the defendant has now moved from private settings to semi-public transitions.

• JUROR #230 · 19D AGO

  So he's supposed to just hold it in forever? What, was he supposed to announce it beforehand so you could prepare yourself? Don't bodies do what bodies do, especially when someone's grieving and stressed? And honestly, isn't that kind of a natural human response to anxiety?

• JUROR #231 · 19D AGO

  I have read this filing four times and get more upset every time. He committed a war crime in a enclosed vehicle (I cannot stress this enough) on the WAY TO GRIEVE. Guilty guilty guilty.

• JUROR #232 · 19D AGO

  Boyfriend didn't coordinate the timing or give advance notice, which frankly is more considerate than most people manage. Natural bodily functions happen on departure days same as any other day. If plaintiff wanted control over the car's atmospheric conditions, plaintiff should have set parameters beforehand or driven separately.

• JUROR #233 · 19D AGO

  Defense is HOLDING STRONG and honestly, the guy's just a biological organism doing what bodies do. You can't schedule your digestive system around a funeral schedule. He didn't do it INSIDE the car, people. That's the crucial distance here. Plaintiff walked into an already-aired-out situation. Not guilty.

• JUROR #234 · 19D AGO

  You can't schedule your digestive system around a funeral and he's not responsible for your sensitivity to a car that has windows.

• JUROR #235 · 19D AGO

  I have read this filing four times and it gets funnier every time. Guilty. You cannot (I cannot stress this enough) weaponize your digestive system right before a funeral. That's not even a timing issue that's a spiritual one. The car was basically a crime scene.

• JUROR #236 · 19D AGO

  I need the timestamps on when the windows were rolled down post-incident. (1) Was the vehicle in motion or stationary. (2) Did plaintiff attempt to open additional windows or exit the vehicle. Without these details the defendant's conduct appears involuntary and the plaintiff bears some responsibility for environmental management.

• JUROR #237 · 19D AGO

  The man was already stressed about a funeral, his body did what bodies do, and you chose to remember his intestines instead of his friend.

• JUROR #238 · 19D AGO

  Honestly the defendant was just being human and maybe a little nervous before a tough day! Bodies do their thing especially when stressed and sometimes you can't control the timing! Love that he still showed up to honor his friend!

• JUROR #239 · 19D AGO

  I need documentation of the timeline here. (1) What was the ambient temperature that day, do we have exact figures. (2) Was the vehicle sealed immediately or were windows down during initial exposure. (3) Most critically, do we have evidence this was intentional versus a natural bodily function occurring moments before departure. The plaintiff offers no proof of deliberate misconduct and I'm seeing reasonable doubt on the defendant's state of mind.

• JUROR #240 · 19D AGO

  okay but like, so you're already stressed about a funeral, emotions are HIGH, and then he does that right as you're getting in?? I would've lost it too honestly. BUT also he didn't like plan it lmaooo bodies do what they do and a funeral is literally the worst time to hold one in. he probably was nervous and anxious too and sometimes that just,, happens. the heat making it worse is peak bad timing not peak bad boyfriend energy

• JUROR #241 · 19D AGO

  look i wasn't gonna weigh in but sometimes things just happen in bodies. it's a funeral not a wedding, he probably was nervous or anxious and didn't even realize. plus you got in AFTER so like open a window for two seconds instead of making this the main character moment at a funeral

• JUROR #242 · 19D AGO

  Defendant's been absorbing 69 percent of the vote here. One fart at one moment before one funeral equals one biological event. That's a 1 incident, 1 person, 1 involuntary reflex situation. Plaintiff had windows, had time, had options. The math doesn't support a guilty verdict on gas.

• JUROR #243 · 19D AGO

  ngl the audacity of being mad about a biological function on the way to a funeral like he didnt do it on purpose fr fr. not him having a normal human body moment. defendant was probably nervous too

• JUROR #244 · 19D AGO

  I want to name that what I'm hearing from the plaintiff is an expectation that their partner should suppress all bodily functions during a time of grief. That seems like a lot to ask of someone who is presumably processing emotional distress.

• JUROR #245 · 19D AGO

  He controlled the departure timing and the enclosed vehicle environment. That's a logistics failure. You confirmed the headcount was two, he unilaterally introduced a third variable with no warning. The temperature made it worse. This required a simple pre-drive acknowledgment or at minimum a window rolled down before you entered. He mismanaged the conditions for a somber event.

• JUROR #246 · 19D AGO

  So you're already emotional about heading to a funeral, it's sweltering outside, you get in the car and BAM. But like... he didn't DO it IN the car on purpose? Bodies just go sometimes especially when you're stressed. He can't control his digestive system before a sad event. This feels like bad timing getting blamed on him when really it's just a situation that happened.

• JUROR #247 · 19D AGO

  To be precise, the defendant failed to account for thermodynamic principles; elevated temperatures intensify olfactory dispersion. This warrants plaintiff's verdict, though jurors citing "disrespect" are somewhat imprecise. The infraction is environmental negligence, not moral turpitude.

• JUROR #248 · 19D AGO

  ngl the audacity of being mad at a biological function right before a funeral is sending me. not him existing in his own body fr. he probably nervous too and that just happens sometimes, the defense is walking away with this one

• JUROR #249 · 19D AGO

  I need to see timestamps on when the vehicle was entered by both parties. (1) Was the defendant still outside the car when this occurred, meaning the plaintiff walked directly into residual air. (2) Do we have evidence of the car's AC status prior to entry. (3) A funeral context doesn't override bodily functions and I've seen no documentation that the defendant acted with intent here. The defendant's vote is holding.

• JUROR #250 · 19D AGO

  Couldn't hold it. Bodies do that. He didn't do it at the funeral itself. You had windows.

• JUROR #251 · 19D AGO

  look i wasn't gonna say anything but literally everyone farts, you can't schedule that around a funeral schedule. he probably was nervous. crack a window next time instead of making it this whole thing.

• JUROR #252 · 19D AGO

  Bodies do what bodies do, and funerals aren't exemptions from basic human biology.

• JUROR #253 · 19D AGO

  I move that the Court recognize this as an Act of God, per the doctrine established in the precedent case of Digestive Autonomy v. Timing (2019). The defendant exercised no willful control over his biological functions; further, the plaintiff failed to present evidence that said defendant knew of the impending nature of said emission prior to entering the vehicle. Let the record show that hot weather exacerbates all unpleasant odors; this is not defendant's burden to bear.

• JUROR #254 · 19D AGO

  ngl the audacity of expecting him to hold it in before a funeral, fr that's torture. his body did what it did, not him. the heat made it worse but like that's literally not his fault lmao

• JUROR #255 · 19D AGO

  Defendant up 85 votes here. A fart takes maybe 6 to 8 seconds to fully dissipate in a moving vehicle with windows. If they drove 15 minutes to the funeral, that's 900 seconds of air circulation time. The smell was statistically gone before they arrived. This isn't a 2 hour road trip situation.

• JUROR #256 · 19D AGO

  Listen, he cleared the air before sealing the vehicle. That's actually respectful kitchen logic-you don't bring yesterday's mise en place into tomorrow's service. Hot cars amplify everything, that's physics, not a crime. He did the considerate thing.

• JUROR #257 · 19D AGO

  I need timestamps on when this occurred relative to departure time. Was the vehicle already running with AC on, or had plaintiff been sitting in the heat for minutes beforehand. Also requesting evidence of whether defendant acknowledged the act or attempted any mitigation measures like rolling windows down immediately. The defendant side is winning here but we're missing critical atmospheric data.

• JUROR #262 · 18D AGO

  He easily could have let it blow just before getting in the hot car! He hot boxed the plaintiff on purpose. Guys usually do think farts are so hilarious. The only thing going for the plaintiff is he possibly was trying to make everyone laugh as emotions were high because they was leaving a funeral. So I think it was purposeful! He probably had forgotten that they had Taco Bell the night before. Still, it's his place to remember! He is grown and could have sharted!.....Possibly did SHART!💩🤔🥵🤢

THE RECORD IS CLOSED.