Call It Out
CASE CIO-2026-00040 · FILED JULY 5, 2026
VERDICT: THE DEFENDANT PREVAILS

He rated the group trip 'mid' in the group chat he didn't pay for.

The Plaintiff
Their Group Chat Member
VS
FINAL · 517 VOTES
PLAINTIFF — OPENING STATEMENT

I planned the trip. Spreadsheet, bookings, a laminated itinerary. He paid for nothing, attended everything, ate the snacks I bought, and then, back home, safe, tanned, rated the entire trip 'mid' in the group chat. The audacity has kept me up two nights.

Filed JULY 5, 2026 · 08:57
DEFENDANT — DEFENSE

The beach day was objectively mid; it rained. I said the trip was mid, not the company, an important legal distinction. Also entered into evidence: the laminated itinerary scheduled 'spontaneous fun' for 2 p.m. daily, which the jury deserves to know.

Filed JULY 5, 2026 · 21:57
THE PLAINTIFF DEMANDS

A retraction in the group chat, same font size.

Jury deliberation

  • JUROR #9 · 21D AGO

    the laminated itinerary is doing a lot of work in this defense.

  • JUROR #44 · 20D AGO

    scheduled spontaneous fun… plaintiff I love you but that's a crime too

  • JUROR #517 · 19D AGO

    No reviews should be allowed until payment is made in full.

THE RECORD IS CLOSED.

SHARE THE CASE
VERDICT: THE DEFENDANT PREVAILS